It didn't take long for the controversial new editorial writer a the New York Timesto deliver the goods — the goods in this case being tired and Watch Taboo Sex Daughterweak excuses for why mainstream media publications should give credence to climate change deniers.
On Friday afternoon, the Timespublished the first column from Bret Stephens, in which he argues "ordinary citizens also have a right to be skeptical of an overweening scientism" in relation to climate change.
SEE ALSO: We’re about to test out hacking the Earth’s climate. That should scare and inspire you.While the Timesdoesn't seem to have any writers extolling the flat earth theory or delving into the issues around chemtrails, it saw fit to recently hire Stephens, a noted conservative writer, best known in the science community for his climate change denial.
He didn't waste any time. And the Timesclearly saw an opportunity, finding it necessary not just to publish the column but also send a push alert about it.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
The column extolls the virtues of skepticism in the face of certainty, leading off by pointing out that a lot of people were sure that Hillary Clinton would beat Donald Trump.
Yes, the new conservative writer started off by trolling his audience while also constructing a laughable straw man argument. In Stephens's world, "data" is all the same and anyone who can add together numbers is a scientist who should be taken with a grain of salt.
The push alert in particular rubbed people the wrong way.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
The column comes just as the Timesbuilds up a climate reporting team.
"As the earth’s temperature continues to break records, climate and environmental reporting is taking on new urgency," the company wrote on a very pretty page touting the open jobs on its team.
The column also comes one week after March for Science and one day before the People's March for Climate.
Stephens was theoretically hired to bring "balance" to the NYT's pages, with some feeling the publication had skewed too far to the "left."
Others have pointed out that this kind of "balance" tends to be a fool's errand, particularly as other kinds of "balance" are ignored.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
We can only feel sympathetic for the science editors at the Times, one of whom decided the best defense is a good offense.
It is, admittedly, a good burn.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
(Editor: {typename type="name"/})
Bargaining For the Common Good
Listen to a William Carlos Williams Radio Interview from 1950
Elon Musk strips headlines Twitter/X links because he didn't like how they looked
Best robot vacuum deal: Save $200 on Eufy X10 Pro Omni robot vacuum
W. Eugene Smith’s Obsessive, Quixotic Documentary Work
“Paint to End Painting”: A Look at Brice Marden’s Notebooks
The Lights Dim at La Pagode, One of Paris’s Best Cinemas
NYT Connections hints and answers for May 18: Tips to solve 'Connections' #707.
How Terrifying a Ship on Fire Is—Robert Walser on Shipwrecks
Today's Hurdle hints and answers for May 12, 2025
Read Our Interviews with Pevear & Volokhonsky, and Peter Cole
接受PR>=1、BR>=1,流量相当,内容相关类链接。